Mirror Worlds, LLC v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 24

ORDER granting #23 Motion for Extension of Time. The deadline for parties to submit agreed docket control and discovery orders are extended to 9-2-08; the effective Rule 16 Scheduling Conference is deemed to be 9-2-08 for purposes of computing the time deadlines under the local patent rules; Apple's deadline for compliance with PR 3-3 and 3-4 is set for 10-20-08. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 07/29/08. cc:attys 7-29-08 (mll, )

Download PDF
Mirror Worlds, LLC v. Apple, Inc. Doc. 24 Case 6:08-cv-00088-LED Document 23-2 Filed 07/28/2008 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION MIRROR WORLDS, LLC Plaintiff, vs. APPLE, INC. Defendant. § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 6:08-CV-88 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ORDER GRANTING AGREED MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINES Apple Inc. ("Apple") and Mirror Worlds, LLC ("Mirror Worlds") respectfully submitted an Agreed Motion to extend the deadline for submitting the agreed docket control and discovery orders as set in the Court's July 17, 2008 Order [D.I. 21]; to set the effective Rule 16 Scheduling Conference accordingly; and to set the deadline for Apple to comply with P.R. 3-3 and 3-4. After considering the motion and that it is agreed, the motion is hereby GRANTED. As such, it is ORDERED that the deadline for the parties to submit agreed docket control and discovery orders be extended from July 28, 2008 to September 2, 2008; that the effective Rule 16 Scheduling Conference is deemed to be September 2, 2008 for purposes of computing the time deadlines under the local patent rules; and that Apple's deadline for compliance with P.R. 3-3 and 3-4 be set at October 20, 2008. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 29th day of July, 2008. __________________________________ LEONARD DAVIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?