Mirror Worlds, LLC v. Apple, Inc.
Filing
359
NOTICE by Mirror Worlds, LLC of Dismissal with Prejudice of Certain Infringement Claims (Solo, Alexander)
Mirror Worlds, LLC v. Apple, Inc.
Doc. 359
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
MIRROR WORLDS, LLC, Plaintiff,
Civil Action No. 6:08-CV-88 LED JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
v. APPLE, INC., Defendant. APPLE, INC., Counterclaim Plaintiff, v. MIRROR WORLDS, LLC, MIRROR WORLDS, TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Counterclaim Defendants.
MIRROR WORLDS, LLC'S NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF CERTAIN INFRINGEMENT CLAIMS Plaintiff Mirror Worlds, LLC ("Mirror Worlds") advises the Court that it agrees to the dismissal with prejudice of the following claims against the following present1 and past accused instrumentalities: 1. Mirror Worlds agrees to the dismissal with prejudice of its claims that Apple directly and/or indirectly infringed or infringes claims 13-17 and 20 of U.S. Patent No. 6,006,227 by
1
"present" refers to availability at the close of discovery. -1-
Dockets.Justia.com
making, using, selling and/or offering to sell the iPhone containing the iPhone OS 3.0 or earlier versions of that operating system. 2. Mirror Worlds agrees to the dismissal with prejudice of its claims that Apple directly and/or indirectly infringed or infringes claims 22, 25, 26, 29, 32, 34, and 37 of U.S. Patent No. 6,725,427 ("the `427 patent") by making, using, selling and/or offering to sell present and past versions of the iPhone, iPod Touch, iPod Nano, iPod Classic or iPad. 3. Mirror Worlds agrees to the dismissal with prejudice of its claims that Apple directly and/or indirectly infringes claims 22, 25, 26, 29 and 37 of the `427 patent by making, using, selling and/or offering to sell computers having past or present versions of iTunes, except that Mirror Worlds does not withdraw its claims regarding those claims to the extent that iTunes is running on an Apple computer using an accused Mac OS X operating system (i.e., Tiger, Leopard and Snow Leopard). 4. Mirror Worlds agrees to the dismissal with prejudice of its claims that Apple directly and/or indirectly infringes claims 22, 25, 26, 29, 34, and 37 of the `427 patent by making, using, selling and/or offering to sell computers having past or present versions of Safari 4, except that Mirror Worlds does not withdraw its claims regarding those claims to the extent that Safari 4 is running on an Apple computer using an accused Mac OS X operating system (i.e., Tiger, Leopard and Snow Leopard). 5. Mirror Worlds agrees to the dismissal with prejudice of its claims that Apple directly and/or indirectly infringes any claim of the `427 patent by making, using, selling and/or offering to past or present versions of Apple TV. Mirror Worlds agrees to the dismissal of the above claims with prejudice only as to present and past versions of the accused instrumentalities as described in the discovery provided
-2-
on those instrumentalities by Apple. Mirror Worlds reserves the right to assert infringement should the above instrumentalities be modified to include the patented technology.
Dated: September 1, 2010
Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ Alexander Solo Otis Carroll, Lead Counsel (Texas State Bar No. 03895700) Deborah Race (Texas State Bar No. 16448700) IRELAND CARROLL & KELLEY, P.C. 6101 S. Broadway, Suite 500 Tyler, Texas 75703 Tel: (903) 561-1600 Fax: (903) 581-1071 Email: Fedserv@icklaw.com Joseph Diamante (Pro Hac Vice) Kenneth L. Stein (Pro Hac Vice) Ian G. DiBernardo (Pro Hac Vice) Alexander Solo (Pro Hac Vice) STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP 180 Maiden Lane New York, N.Y. 10038 Tel: (212) 806-5400 Email: asolo@stroock.com ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF MIRROR WORLDS LLC
-3-
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document this 1st day of September, 2010, via the Court's CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3).
/s/ Alexander Solo
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?