Mirror Worlds, LLC v. Apple, Inc.
Joint MOTION to Amend/Correct Discovery and Docket Control Orders by Mirror Worlds Technologies, Inc., Mirror Worlds, LLC, Apple, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Smith, Stefani)
Mirror Worlds, LLC v. Apple, Inc.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION MIRROR WORLDS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. APPLE INC., Defendant. § § Civil Action No. 6:08-CV-88-LED § § § JURY TRIAL DEMANDED § § § § §
JOINT MOTION TO AMEND DISCOVERY AND DOCKET CONTROL ORDERS On June 2, 2009, the Court ordered the parties to "submit agreed proposed amended Discovery and Docket Control Orders integrating the '101 patent." The parties have met and conferred regarding amendments of the Discovery and Docket Control Orders in order to integrate the `101 patent. The proposed amendments set forth herein put the `101 patent onto
the same schedule as the Mirror Worlds patents by September 2, 2009, the current date for the Patent Local Rule 4-1 exchange. The parties agree that all deadlines not mentioned below should remain unchanged, and should apply equally to both Mirror Worlds' and Apple's claims of patent infringement. Proposed Amendment To Discovery Order: The parties jointly propose providing for an additional 20 interrogatories and an additional 20 requests for admission relating to Apple's patent infringement counterclaim. Proposed Amendments To Docket Control Order:
June 3, 2009 (completed)
August 26, 2009.
Comply with P.R. 3-1 and P.R. 3-2 for `101 patent - Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions due for `101 patent. Thereafter, it is necessary to obtain leave of Court to add and/or amend infringement contentions, pursuant to Patent Rule 3-6 Comply with P.R. 3-3 and 3-4 for `101 patent - Invalidity Contentions due for `101 patent. Thereafter, it is necessary to obtain leave of court to add and/or amend invalidity contentions, pursuant to Patent Rule 3-6.
EXPECTED LENGTH OF TRIAL - 10 days.
No. of trial days
Mirror Worlds, LLC and Mirror Worlds Technologies, Inc. propose changing the Expected Length of Trial to 8 days.1
In addition, Mirror Worlds, LLC and Mirror Worlds Technologies, Inc. are considering and reserve the right to request separate trials on Mirror Worlds, LLC's patent infringement claims and Apple Inc.'s patent infringement counterclaim.
Dated: June 12, 2009 Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Richard An Otis Carroll Texas Bar No. 03895700 Lead Attorney Deborah Race Texas Bar No. 16448700 IRELAND, CARROLL & KELLY, P.C. 6101 S. Broadway, Suite 500 Tyler, Texas 75703 903-561-1600 (Telephone) 903-581-1071 (Facsimile) email@example.com Of counsel: Joseph Diamante (Pro Hac Vice) Kenneth Stein (Pro Hac Vice) Richard An (Pro Hac Vice) STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP 180 Maiden Lane New York, NY 10038 212-806-5400 (Telephone) 212-806-6006 (Facsimile) firstname.lastname@example.org email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.org
/s/ Stefani C. Smith Matthew Powers Lead Attorney Steven S. Cherensky Sonal N. Mehta (Pro Hac Vice) Stefani C. Smith (Pro Hac Vice) WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 201 Redwood Shores Parkway Redwood Shores, CA 94065 650-802-3000 (Telephone) 650-802-3100 (Facsimile) email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.org email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.org Eric M. Albritton Texas State Bar No. 00790215 ALBRITTON LAW FIRM P.O. Box 2649 Longview, Texas 75606 (903) 757-8449 (Telephone) (903) 758-7397 (Facsimile) email@example.com Attorneys for Defendant APPLE INC.
Attorneys for Plaintiff MIRROR WORLDS, LLC
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was filed electronically in compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a) on this 12th day of June, 2009. As of this date, all counsel of record that have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document through the Court's CM/ECF system under Local Rule CV-5(a)(3)(A). /s/ Stefani C. Smith Stefani C. Smith
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?