Klausner Technologies Inc v. Verizon Wireless et al

Filing 70

Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Complaint and Plaintiff to File Its Response to the Verizon Defendants' Motion to Transfer to the Eastern District of New York Pursuant to the First-to-File Rule Deadlines by Klausner Technologies Inc, Verizon Wireless, Verizon Data Services LLC, Bell Atlantic Communications, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Jones, Michael)

Download PDF
Klausner Technologies Inc v. Verizon Wireless et al Doc. 70 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION Klausner Technologies, Inc. v. Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless Verizon Data Services LLC Bell Atlantic Communications, Inc. Citrix Systems, Inc. Comverse, Inc. Cox Communications, Inc. Embarq Communications, Inc. Google Inc. GrandCentral Communications, Inc. LG Electronics Mobilecomm USA, Inc. PhoneFusion, Inc. RingCentral, Inc. § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-341 JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME REGARDING THE VERIZION DEFENDANTS' ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT AND PLAINTIFF TO FILE ITS RESPONSE TO THE VERIZON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO TRANSFER TO THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PURSUANT TO THE FIRST-TO-FILE RULE DEADLINES COME NOW, Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, Verizon Data Services LLC and Bell Atlantic Communications, Inc. (collectively, the "Verizon Defendants"), and Plaintiff Klausner Technologies, Inc. ("Klausner") and files this Joint Motion for Extension of Time Regarding the Verizon Defendants' Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint and Plaintiff to File its Response to the Verizon Defendants' Motion to Transfer to the Eastern District of New York Pursuant to the First-to-File Rule Deadlines. The Verizon Defendants' Answers and Klausner's response brief are currently due on November 10, 2008. The parties have reached a settlement agreement and anticipate final dismissal papers to be filed in the next few days. {A07\7484\0004\W0378879.1 } Dockets.Justia.com The Verizon Defendants and Klausner request that their answer and response date be extended through November 14, 2008. Dated: November 10, 2008 By: Respectfully submitted, /s/ Michael E. Jones Michael E. Jones State Bar No. 10929400 Allen F. Gardner State Bar No. 24043679 POTTER MINTON A Professional Corporation 110 N. College, Suite 500 (75702) P. O. Box 359 Tyler, Texas 75710 (903) 597 8311 (903) 593 0846 (Facsimile) mikejones@potterminton.com allengardner@potterminton.com OF COUNSEL: John M. Desmarais KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 153 East 53rd Street New York, NY 10022-4675 Tel: 212-446-4800 Edward C. Donovan KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 655 Fifteenth Street, NW Washington, DC 20005 Tel: 202-879-5000 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS CELLCO PARTNERSHIP D/B/A VERIZON WIRELESS, VERIZON DATA SERVICES LLC AND BELL ATLANTIC COMMUNICATIONS, INC. {A07\7484\0004\W0378879.1 } /s/ Elizabeth L. DeRieux, with permission by Michael E. Jones Elizabeth L. DeRieux Lead Attorney SBN: 05770585 ederieux@capshawlaw.com S. Calvin Capshaw, III SBN: 03783900 ccapshaw@capshawlaw.com N. Claire Abernathy SBN : 24053063 chenry@capshawlaw.com CAPSHAW DERIEUX, LLP 1127 Judson Rd., Su 220 Longview, TX 75601-5157 Tel : 903-236-9800 Fax: 903-236-8787 Gregory S. Dovel greg@dovellaw.com Sean A. Luner luner@dovellaw.com Christin K. Cho christen@dovellaw.com DOVEL & LUNER, LLP 201 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 600 Santa Monica, CA 90401 Tel: 310-656-7066 Fax: 310-657-7069 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF, KLAUSNER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court's CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on November 10, 2008. Any other counsel of record will be served by first class mail on this same date. /s/ Michael E. Jones Michael E. Jones {A07\7484\0004\W0378879.1 }

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?