Klausner Technologies Inc v. Verizon Wireless et al

Filing 97

ANSWER to 93 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim (Plaintiff Klausner Technologies, Inc.'s Reply to Counterclaims of Google, Inc.) by Klausner Technologies Inc.(DeRieux, Elizabeth)

Klausner Technologies Inc v. Verizon Wireless et al

Doc. 97

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION KLAUSNER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a New York corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Verizon Wireless (Cell co Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless), a Delaware general partnership; Verizon Data Services LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; Bell Atlantic Communications, Inc., a Delaware corporation; Citrix Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation; Comverse, Inc., a Delaware corporation; Cox Communications, Inc., a Delaware corporation; Embarq Communications, Inc., a Delaware corporation; Google Inc., a Delaware corporation; GrandCentral Communications, Inc., a Delaware corporation; LG Electronics Mobilecomm U.S.A., Inc., a California Corporation; PhoneFusion, Inc., a Delaware corporation; RingCentral, Inc., a California Corporation, Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § §

Case No. 6:08-cv-341 (LED) (JURY TRIAL)

PLAINTIFF KLAUSNER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'S REPLY TO COUNTERCLAIMS OF GOOGLE, INC. Plaintiff Klausner Technologies, Inc. ("Klausner") hereby answers the counterclaims of Defendant Google, Inc. ("Google"). The paragraphs in this reply are numbered to correspond

with the paragraph numbers in Google's counterclaims; accordingly, the first numbered paragraph is number 36. All of the allegations of the counterclaims not specifically admitted herein are specifically denied.

Dockets.Justia.com

The Parties 36. Upon information and belief, Klausner admits the allegations contained in

paragraph 36 of Google' s counterclaims. 37. counterclaims. 38. counterclaims. 39. counterclaims. Jurisdiction 40. Klausner admits that this Court has subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ Klausner admits the allegations contained in paragraph 39 of Google' s Klausner admits the allegations contained in paragraph 38 of Google' s Klausner admits the allegations contained in paragraph 37 of Google' s

1331 and 1338. 41. counterclaims. Venue 42. Court. Count 1: Declaratory Relief Regarding the '576 Patent 43. counterclaims. 44. counterclaims. 45. counterclaims. Count 2: Declaratory Relief Regarding the '818 Patent 46. counterclaims. Klausner admits the allegations contained in paragraph 46 of Google' s Klausner denies the allegations contained in paragraph 45 of Go ogle's Klausner denies the allegations contained in paragraph 44 of Google' s Klausner admits the allegations contained in paragraph 43 of Google' s Klausner admits that venue over these counterclaims is proper in this District Klausner admits the allegations contained in paragraph 41 of Google' s

2

47. counterclaims. 48. counterclaims.

Klausner denies the allegations contained in paragraph 47 of Google' s

Klausner denies the allegations contained in paragraph 48 of Google' s Prayer for Judgment

Klausner denies that Google is entitled to the judgment it seeks or any relief for the allegations made in its counterclaims. Jury Demand Klausner demands trial by jury of all issues.

Dated: December 10, 2008

Respectfully submitted, By: lsi Elizabeth L. DeRieux S. Calvin Capshaw State Bar No. 03783900 Elizabeth L. DeRieux State Bar No. 05770585 N. Claire Abernathy State Bar No. 24053063 CAPSHAW DERIEUX, LLP 1127 Judson Road, Suite 220 Longview, Texas 75601 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] E-mail: [e-mail] E-mail: [e-mail] E-mail: [e-mail]

3

Gregory S. Dovel California State Bar No. 135387 Sean A. Luner California State BarNo. 165443 Christin K. Cho California State Bar No. 238173 DOVEL & LUNER, LLP 201 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 600 Santa Monica, California 90401 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] E-mail: [e-mail] E-mail: [e-mail] E-mail: [e-mail] Robert Christopher Bunt State Bar No. 00787165 Charles Ainsworth State Bar No. 00783521 Parker, Bunt & Ainsworth, P.C. 100 East Ferguson, Suite 1114 Tyler, Texas 75702 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] E-mail: [e-mail] E-mail: [e-mail] ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF, KLAUSNER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE This is to certify that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served this io" day of December, 2008, with a copy of this document via the Court's CMlECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3). Any other counsel of record will be served via electronic mail, facsimile transmission andlor first class mail on this same date.

lsi Elizabeth L. DeRieux
Elizabeth L. DeRieux

4