EMG Technology, LLC v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 79

Additional Attachments to Main Document: 78 Amended Complaint.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Patent No. 7,441,196, # 2 Exhibit B - Patent No. 7,020,845)(Ainsworth, Charles)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION EMG TECHNOLOGY, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 6:08-cv-447-LED APPLE INC., AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., BLOOMBERG, L.P., CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC., UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Defendants. ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS TO THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Docket No. 78 Index 1. 2. Exhibit A - United States Patent No. 7,441,196 (the "'196 Patent") Exhibit B - United States Patent No. 7,020,845 (the "`845 Patent") Respectfully Submitted, By: /s/ Charles Ainsworth Charles Ainsworth State Bar No. 00783521 Robert Christopher Bunt State Bar No. 00787165 PARKER, BUNT & AINSWORTH, P.C. 100 E. Ferguson, Suite 1114 Tyler, TX 75702 903/531-3535 903/533-9687 E-mail: charley@pbatyler.com E-mail: rcbunt@pbatyler.com ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF, EMG TECHNOLOGY, LLC JURY TRIAL DEMANDED DATED: June 19, 2009 OF COUNSEL: Jeffer, Mangels, Butler and Marmaro, LLP Stanley M. Gibson (Cal. Bar No. 162329) smg@jmbm.com Joshua S. Hodas, Ph.D. (Cal. Bar No. 250812) jsh@jmbm.com 1900 Avenue of the Stars, Seventh Floor Los Angeles, CA 90067 Telephone: (310) 203-8080 Facsimile: (310) 203-0567 1 Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP Robert D. Becker (Cal. Bar No. 160648) rbecker@manatt.com Shawn G. Hansen (Cal. Bar No. 197033) shansen@manatt.com 1001 Page Mill Road, Building 2 Palo Alto, CA 94304 Telephone: (650) 812-1300 Facsimile: (650) 213-0260 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that all counsel of record, who are deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served this 19th day of June, 2009, with a copy of this document via the Court's CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3). /s/ Charles Ainsworth CHARLES AINSWORTH 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?