Aloft Media, LLC v. Yahoo! Inc. et al

Filing 79

NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Matthew Clay Harris on behalf of Aloft Media, LLC (Harris, Matthew)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION ALOFT MEDIA, LLC, Plaintiff, v. YAHOO!, INC., GOOGLE, INC. and AOL LLC Defendant. Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-509 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED NOTICE OF APPEARANCE Aloft Media, LLC, plaintiff in the above-entitled and numbered civil action, hereby notifies the Court and all parties that the following person, in addition to those who previously gave notice, is appearing as counsel of record. Matthew C. Harris Texas State Bar No. 24059904 ALBRITTON LAW FIRM P.O. Box 2649 Longview, TX 75601 (903) 757-8449 (phone) (903) 758-7397 (fax) mch@emafirm.com 1 Respectfully submitted, ___________________________________ Eric M. Albritton Texas State Bar No. 00790215 Adam A. Biggs Texas State Bar No. 24051753 Matthew C. Harris Texas State Bar No. 24059904 ALBRITTON LAW FIRM P.O. Box 2649 Longview, Texas 75606 (903) 757-8449 (phone) (903) 758-7397 (fax) ema@emafirm.com aab@emafirm.com mch@emafirm.com T. John Ward, Jr. State Bar No. 00794818 Ward & Smith Law Firm P.O. Box 1231 Longview, Texas 75606-1231 (903) 757-6400 (telephone) (903) 757-2323 (facsimile) jw@jwfirm.com Counsel for Aloft Media, LLC CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was filed electronically in compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). As such, this motion was served on all counsel who are deemed to have consented to electronic service. Local Rule CV-5(a)(3)(A). Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d) and Local Rule CV-5(d) and (e), all other counsel of record not deemed to have consented to electronic service were served with a true and correct copy of the foregoing by email, on this the 31st day of July, 2009. ____________________________________ Matthew C. Harris 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?