Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 119

NOTICE of Disclosure by Softlayer Technologies, Inc. (Storm, Paul)

Download PDF
Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al Doc. 119 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION BEDROCK COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES LLC, Plaintiff, vs. 1. SOFTLAYER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 2. CITIWARE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, LLC, 3. GOOGLE, INC., 4. YAHOO! INC., 5. MYSPACE, INC., 6. AMAZON.COM, INC., 7. PAYPAL INC., 8. MATCH.COM, LLC, 9. AOL LLC, and 10. CME GROUP, INC., Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 6:09-cv-269 DEFENDANT SOFTLAYER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'S NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE Defendant Softlayer Technologies, Inc. gives notice that it has complied with the Court's Proposed Discovery Order (Appendix A to Docket No. 78) on November 30th, 2009 by serving its Initial Disclosures upon all counsel of record via electronic mail. Dated: November 30, 2009 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Paul V. Storm Paul V. Storm State Bar No. 19325350 paulstorm@stormllp.com Anthony P. Miller State Bar No. 24041484 amiller@stormllp.com DEFENDANT SOFTLAYER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE WITH DISCOVERY ORDER Page 1 Dockets.Justia.com S. Scott Pershern State Bar No. 24060412 spershern@stormllp.com STORM LLP 901 Main Street Suite 7100 Dallas, Texas 75202 214-347-4700 (Telephone) 214-347-4799 (Facsimile) COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT SOFTLAYER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. DEFENDANT SOFTLAYER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE WITH DISCOVERY ORDER Page 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court's CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on November 30, 2009. /s/ Paul V. Storm Paul V. Storm _______ DEFENDANT SOFTLAYER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE WITH DISCOVERY ORDER Page 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?