Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 141

ORDER granting #137 Motion for Extension of Time. The deadline for defts to file their Reply in Support of defts' Motion to Compel pltf to Comply with Patent Rule 3-1 and to Extend the Time to Serve Invalidity Contentions is 1-07-2010. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 12/30/09. cc:attys 12-30-09(mll, )

Download PDF
Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al Doc. 141 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION BEDROCK COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES LLC, Plaintiff, v. SOFTLAYER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., CITIWARE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, LLC, GOOGLE INC., YAHOO! INC., MYSPACE INC., AMAZON.COM INC., PAYPAL INC., MATCH.COM, LLC., AOL LLC, and CME GROUP INC., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 6:09-CV-00269 Hon. Leonard E. Davis JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE THEIR REPLY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF TO COMPLY WITH PATENT RULE 3-1 AND TO EXTEND THE TIME TO SERVE INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS Before the Court is the Defendants' Unopposed Motion to Extend the Deadline for Defendants to File their Reply in Support of Defendants' Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Comply with Patent Rule-3-1 and to Extend the Time to Serve Invalidity Contentions. The Court having reviewed the motion hereby GRANTS Defendants' Motion to Extend the Deadline. It is therefore, ORDERED that the deadline for Defendants to file their Reply in Support of Defendants' Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Comply with Patent Rule 3-1 and to Extend the Time to Serve Invalidity Contentions is January 7, 2010. Dockets.Justia.com So ORDERED and SIGNED this 30th day of December, 2009. __________________________________ LEONARD DAVIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?