Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 192

NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Patrick Colbert Clutter, IV on behalf of Google Inc., Match.Com LLC (Clutter, Patrick)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION BEDROCK COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES LLC, Plaintiff, v. SOFTLAYER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., CITIWARE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, LLC, GOOGLE INC., YAHOO! INC., MYSPACE INC., AMAZON.COM INC., PAYPAL INC., MATCH.COM, LLC, AOL LLC, and CME GROUP INC., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 6:09-CV-00269 Hon. Leonard E. Davis JURY TRIAL DEMANDED NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF ADDITIONAL COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS GOOGLE INC. AND MATCH.COM, LLC Defendants GOOGLE INC. AND MATCH.COM, LLC file this Notice of Appearance of Additional Counsel, and hereby notifies the Court that Patrick C. Clutter of the law firm Potter Minton, A Professional Corporation, 110 North College, Suite 500, Tyler, Texas 75702, is appearing as additional counsel for GOOGLE INC. AND MATCH.COM, LLC in the abovereferenced matter. All pleadings, discovery, correspondence and other material should be served upon counsel at the address referenced above. {KMC\7713\0011\W0409945.1 } Dated: April 28, 2010 Respectfully submitted, POTTER MINTON A Professional Corporation 110 N. College, Suite 500 (75702) P. O. Box 359 Tyler, Texas 75710 (903) 597 8311 (903) 593 0846 (Facsimile) By: /s/ Patrick C. Clutter Patrick C. Clutter State Bar No. 24036374 Attorneys for Defendants GOOGLE INC. AND MATCH.COM, LLC CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that all counsel of record who have consented to electronic service and are being served with a copy of this document via the Court's CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV5(a)(3) on April 28, 2010. Any other counsel of record will be served by First Class U.S. mail on this same date. /s/Patrick C. Clutter {KMC\7713\0011\W0409945.1 } 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?