Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 519

NOTICE by Google Inc., Match.Com LLC of Service of 2nd Amended Trial Witness Lists (Jones, Michael)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION BEDROCK COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES LLC, Plaintiff, v. SOFTLAYER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., CITIWARE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, LLC, GOOGLE INC., YAHOO! INC., MYSPACE INC., AMAZON.COM INC., PAYPAL INC., MATCH.COM, LLC, AOL INC., and CME GROUP INC., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 6:09-cv-269 (LED) Hon. Leonard E. Davis JURY TRIAL DEMANDED NOTICE OF SERVICE REGARDING SECOND AMENDED TRIAL WITNESS LIST Defendants Google Inc. and Match.com, LLC hereby notify the Court that they served a Second Amended Trial Witness List upon all counsel of record on February 23, 2011 via electronic mail. Dated: February 25, 2011 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Michael E. Jones Michael E. Jones State Bar No. 10929400 POTTER MINTON, PC 110 N. College Tyler, Texas 75702 Telephone: (903) 597­8311 Facsimile: (903) 593­0846 Email: mikejones@potterminton.com {A07\7713\0011\W0461268.1 } Claude M. Stern Todd M. Briggs Evette D. Pennypacker QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 555 Twin Dolphin Dr., 5th Floor Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: 650­801­5000 Facsimile: 650­801­5100 Email: claudestern@quinnemanuel.com Email: toddbriggs@quinnemanuel.com Email: evettepennypacker@quinnemanuel.com Attorneys for Defendant Match.com, LLC and Google Inc. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court's CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on February 25, 2011. Any other counsel of record will be served by First Class U.S. mail on this same date. /s/ Michael E. Jones Michael E. Jones {A07\7713\0011\W0461268.1 }

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?