Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 525

NOTICE by Softlayer Technologies, Inc. - Notice of Service of Softlayer Technologies, Inc's Second Amended Trial Witness List (Williams, E Danielle)

Download PDF
Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al Doc. 525 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION Bedrock Computer Technologies LLC, Plaintiff, v. SoftLayer Technologies, Inc., et al., Defendants. Case No. 6:09-CV-269 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED NOTICE OF SERVICE REGARDING SECOND AMENDED TRIAL WITNESS LIST Defendant SoftLayer Technologies, Inc. hereby notifies the Court that they served on February 28, 2011, upon all counsel of record SOFTLAYER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'S SECOND AMENDED TRIAL WITNESS LIST via electronic mail. Respectfully submitted, this the 28th day of February 2011. /s/ E. Danielle T. Williams Steven Gardner E. Danielle T. Williams John C. Alemanni KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP 1001 West 4th Street Winston-Salem, NC 27101 Telephone: 336-607-7300 Fax: 336-607-7500 William H. Boice Russell A. Korn KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP Suite 2800 1100 Peachtree Street Atlanta, GA 30309-4530 Telephone: 404-815-6500 Fax: 404-815-6555 US2008 2283133.1 J. Thad Heartfield Texas Bar No. 09346800 M. Dru Montgomery Texas Bar No. 24010800 THE HEARTFIELD LAW FIRM 2195 Dowlen Road Beaumont, TX 77706 Telephone: 409-866-2800 Fax: 409-866-5789 Attorneys for Defendant SoftLayer Technologies, Inc. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court's CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on February 28, 2011. Any other counsel of record will be served by First Class U.S. mail on this same date. /s/ E. Danielle T. Williams E. Danielle T. Williams US2008 2283133.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?