Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 542

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS recommending #452 SEALED MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Standing filed by Google Inc., Match.Com LLC, MySpace Inc., Amazon.com Inc., Yahoo! Inc., AOL Inc, Softlayer Technologies, Inc., be denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 03/04/11. cc:attys 3-07-11(mll, )

Download PDF
Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al Doc. 542 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION BEDROCK COMPUTER, TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. SOFTLAYER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. § § § § § § § No. 6:09cv269 LED-JDL JURY DEMANDED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Before the Court is Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Standing (Doc. No. 452). Bedrock has filed a response (Doc. No. 511), and Defendants have filed a reply (Doc. No. 541). Upon consideration of the parties' arguments, the Court RECOMMENDS that Defendants' Motion be DENIED. Within fourteen (14) days after receipt of the Magistrate Judge's Report, any party may serve and file written objections to the findings and recommendations contained in the Report. A party's failure to file written objections to the findings, conclusions and recommendations contained in this Report within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy shall bar that party from de novo review by the district judge of those findings, conclusions and recommendations and, except on . grounds of plain error, from appellate review of unobjected-to factual findings and legal conclusions accepted and adopted by the district court. Douglass v. United States Auto. Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996). So ORDERED and SIGNED this 4th day of March, 2011. ___________________________________ JOHN D. LOVE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?