Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 652

ORDER granting #636 Motion for Entry of Stipulation of the Parties. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 03/23/11. cc:attys 3-24-11 (mll, )

Download PDF
Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al Doc. 652 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION BEDROCK COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES LLC, Plaintiff, v. SOFTLAYER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., CITIWARE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, LLC, GOOGLE INC., YAHOO! INC., MYSPACE INC., AMAZON.COM INC., PAYPAL INC., MATCH.COM, INC., AOL LLC, AND CME GROUP INC., Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § CASE NO. 6:09-cv-269-LED Jury Trial Demanded JOINT STIPULATION ORDER Plaintiff, Bedrock Computer Technologies LLC, and Defendants SoftLayer Technologies, Inc., Google Inc., Yahoo! Inc., MySpace, Inc., Amazon.com Inc., Match.com, Inc. and AOL Inc. (collectively the "Parties"), filed their Joint Motion For Entry of Stipulation of the Parties. The Court, having reviewed the Joint Motion, and being well-advised, finds that the motion should be GRANTED. It is therefore ORDERED that (1) The Parties will address the question of invalidity of the '120 patent under a presumption of validity and under the preponderance of evidence standard. The Parties will not mention the clear and convincing evidence standard regarding invalidity. The Parties will not mention that the presumption of validity does not apply. The Parties will not mention to the jury that the law on invalidity has changed over time. ORDER ­ Page 1 Dockets.Justia.com . (2) No Party may use this Stipulation at trial or admit this Stipulation into evidence. SO ORDERED. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 23rd day of March, 2011. ___________________________________ JOHN D. LOVE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ORDER ­ Page 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?