Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 672

HOTLINE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 03/29/11. cc:attys 3-29-11(mll, )

Download PDF
Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al Doc. 672 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION BEDROCK COMPUTER, TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. SOFTLAYER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. No. 6:09cv269 LED-JDL JURY DEMANDED ORDER RE: "HOTLINE" HEARING PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE CV-26(g) Participants: Austin Curry - Attorney for Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC Phillip Aurentz - Attorney for Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC Todd Briggs - Attorney for Google, Inc. March 29, 2011 Deposition Questions Date: Action on: The case is assigned to United States Magistrate Judge John Love. The Court held a Hotline hearing between the above named parties to resolve a dispute regarding the scope of questioning during a deposition. Pursuant to a previous Order (Doc. No. 548), Google produced a witness for deposition to testify as to allegedly non-infringing code implemented by Google. Plaintiff argued that certain questions regarding Google's performance testing should be answered. Counsel for Google contended such questions were outside the limited scope of the . Court's Order. After hearing argument, the Court overruled Google's objections to the line of testing questioning, making clear that such ruling did not preclude a challenge to the admissibility of the deponent's answers. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 29th day of March, 2011. ___________________________________ JOHN D. LOVE UNITED STATES JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?