Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 867

ORDER denying #865 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply ; denying #866 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Motions are denied without prejudice if parties can agree on a schedule where all replies and surreplies are filed no later than 7-18-2011. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 07/07/11. cc:attys 7-07-11 (mll, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
BEDROCK COMPUTER
TECHNOLOGIES,
Plaintiff,
vs.
YAHOO! INC.,
Defendant.

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

Civil No. 6:09cv269

ORDER
Before the Court are two Unopposed Motions for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply
(Doc. Nos. 865 & 866). Both motions concern replies to post-trial briefing and request an extension
to file a reply through and including July 15, 2011. If the parties intend to submit surreplies, the
proposed extended briefing schedule does not allow the Court sufficient time to prepare for the
hearing scheduled on July 26, 2011. Consequently, the motions are DENIED without prejudice to
refiling if the parties can agree on a schedule where all replies and surreplies are filed no later than
July 18, 2011.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 7th day of July, 2011.

__________________________________
LEONARD DAVIS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE