Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 881

FINAL JUDGMENT. Bedrock shall pay Yahoos costs in the amount of $115,500 in accordance with Bedrock and Yahoos Agreed Bill of Costs #844 . All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 09/30/11. cc:attys 9-30-11(mll, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION BEDROCK COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Plaintiff, vs. SOFTLAYER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al. Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § NO. 6:09cv269 LED-JDL PATENT CASE FINAL JUDGMENT On June 16, 2009, Plaintiff Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC (“Bedrock”) filed suit against ten (10) Defendants. Since that time, all Defendants but Yahoo!, Inc. (“Yahoo”) have been dismissed: Softlayer Technologies, Inc. (Doc. No. 827); CitiWare Technology Solutions, LLC; Google Inc. (Doc. No. 830); MySpace Inc. (Doc. No. 805); Amazon.com Inc. (Doc. No. 826); PayPal Inc. (Doc. No. 202); Match.com, Inc. (Doc. No. 663); AOL Inc. (Doc. No. 804); and CME Group Inc. (Doc. No. 168). In addition, this action was tried between Bedrock and Yahoo to a jury beginning April 27, 2011. After a five day trial, the jury reached a verdict of noninfringement. In accordance with the jury’s verdict, the Court’s post-trial rulings, and the dismissal of all other Defendants, the Court renders the following judgment: It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Bedrock pay Yahoo’s costs in the amount of $115,500 in accordance with Bedrock and Yahoo’s Agreed Bill of Costs (Doc. No. 844). It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that all pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 30th day of September, 2011. __________________________________ LEONARD DAVIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?