Aloft Media, LLC v. SAP AG et al

Filing 8

NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Adam A Biggs on behalf of Aloft Media, LLC (Biggs, Adam)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION ALOFT MEDIA, LLC, Plaintiff, v. SAP AG, SAP AMERICA, INC., ORACLE CORPORATION, ORACLE USA, INC., GOOGLE, INC., AND YAHOO!, INC., Defendants. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE Aloft Media, LLC, plaintiff in the above-entitled and numbered civil action, hereby notifies the Court and all parties that the following person, in addition to those who previously gave notice, is appearing as counsel of record. Adam A. Biggs Texas State Bar No. 24051753 ALBRITTON LAW FIRM P.O. Box 2649 Longview, TX 75601 Phone: (903) 757-8449 Fax: (903) 758-7397 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Civil Action No. 6:09-cv-303 1 Respectfully submitted, ___________________________________ Eric M. Albritton Texas State Bar No. 00790215 Adam A. Biggs Texas State Bar No. 24051753 ALBRITTON LAW FIRM P.O. Box 2649 Longview, Texas 75606 (903) 757-8449 (phone) (903) 758-7397 (fax) Danny L. Williams Texas State Bar No. 21518050 Christopher N. Cravey Texas State Bar No. 24034398 Matthew R. Rodgers Texas Bar No. 24041802 WILLIAMS, MORGAN & AMERSON, P.C. 10333 Richmond, Suite 1100 Houston, Texas 77042 Telephone: (713)934-4060 Facsimile: (713) 934-7011 Counsel for Aloft Media, LLC 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was filed electronically in compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). As such, this notice was served on all counsel who are deemed to have consented to electronic service. Local Rule CV-5(a)(3)(A). Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d) and Local Rule CV-5(d) and (e), all other counsel of record not deemed to have consented to electronic service were served with a true and correct copy of the foregoing by email, on this the 15th day of July, 2009. ____________________________________ Adam A. Biggs 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?