Aloft Media, LLC v. Oracle Corporation et al

Filing 67

ORDER granting 66 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Deft Fair Isaac Corporation shall have to 3-08-2010 to answer or otherwise respond to pltf's Second Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 02/05/10. cc:attys 2-05-10 (mll, )

Aloft Media, LLC v. Oracle Corporation et al

Doc. 67

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION ALOFT MEDIA, LLC, Plaintiff, v. ORACLE CORPORATION, ET AL., Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § ORDER Before the Court is the unopposed motion of Defendant Fair Isaac Corporation ("FICO") seeking an extension of time to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement in the above-referenced cause until March 8, 2010. After considering the motion, and that Plaintiff has agreed to the extension, the Court finds that it is well taken and is hereby GRANTED. Accordingly, Defendant Fair Isaac Corporation, shall have until and including March 8, 2010, to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 5th day of February, 2010.

Civil Action No. 6:09-CV-304 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

__________________________________ LEONARD DAVIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dockets.Justia.com