Aloft Media, LLC v. Oracle Corporation et al

Filing 78

ORDER granting re 77 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 43 Amended Complaint, Move, Or Otherwise RespondUnopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 43 Amended Complaint, Move, Or Otherwise Respond. Accordingly, Defendants Charles Schwab & Co, Inc., Fidelity Brokerage Services, LLC, E-Trade Securities, LLC and TD Ameritrade, Inc. shall have until and including April 2, 2010, to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 3/19/2010. (kls, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION ALOFT MEDIA, LLC VS. ORACLE CORPORATION, ET AL § § § § §

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:09-CV-304 JURY DEMANDED

ORDER Before the Court is the unopposed motion of Defendants Charles Schwab & Co, Inc., Fidelity Brokerage Services, LLC, E-Trade Securities, LLC and TD Ameritrade, Inc. seeking an extension of time to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement in the above-referenced cause until April 2, 2010. After considering the motion, and that Plaintiff has agreed to the extension, the Court finds that it is well taken and is hereby GRANTED. Accordingly, Defendants Charles Schwab & Co, Inc., Fidelity Brokerage Services, LLC, E-Trade Securities, LLC and TD Ameritrade, Inc. shall have until and including April 2, 2010, to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 19th day of March, 2010.

__________________________________ LEONARD DAVIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE