Aloft Media, LLC v. Oracle Corporation et al

Filing 80

ORDER granting 79 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Deft Fair Isaac Corporation shall have until 4-05-2010 to answer or otherwise respond to pltf's Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 03/23/10. cc:attys 3-23-10 (mll, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION ALOFT MEDIA, LLC, Plaintiff, v. ORACLE CORPORATION, ET AL., Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § ORDER Before the Court is the unopposed motion of Defendant Fair Isaac Corporation ("FICO") seeking an extension of time to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement in the above-referenced cause until April 5, 2010. After considering the motion, and that Plaintiff has agreed to the extension, the Court finds that it is well taken and is hereby GRANTED. Accordingly, Defendant Fair Isaac Corporation, shall have until and including April 5, 2010, to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 23rd day of March, 2010. Civil Action No. 6:09-CV-304 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED __________________________________ LEONARD DAVIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 85550440.1 -1-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?