Evrage v. Commissioner of SSA

Filing 16

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 15 Report and Recommendations, reversing with a finding that Plaintiff is disabled under the Social Security Act and remanding with directions to the Commissioner to pay disability benefits to Plaintiff from April 10, 1998, based on a date last insured of December 31, 2003. Any motion not previously ruled on is denied. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 5/27/11. (mjc, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION JERRY D. EVRAGE § v. § COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION § CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:09-CV-322 § ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which contains her findings, conclusions, and recommendation for the disposition of this action, has been presented for consideration. The Report and Recommendation recommends that the action be reversed with a finding of “disabled” entered consistent with the findings therein and remanded with directions to the Commissioner to pay disability benefits to Plaintiff from April 10, 1998, based on a date last insured of December 31, 2003. No written objections have been filed. The findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are therefore adopted as those of the Court. In light of the foregoing, it is ORDERED that the action is hereby REVERSED with a finding that Plaintiff is disabled under the Social Security Act and REMANDED with directions to the Commissioner to pay disability benefits to Plaintiff from April 10, 1998, based on a date last insured of December 31, 1 2003. It is further ORDERED that any motion not previously ruled on is DENIED. SIGNED this 27th day of May, 2011. ____________________________________ MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?