Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al
Filing
1049
ORDER denying 1042 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 10/24/11. cc:attys 10-24-11 (mll, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Plaintiff,
vs.
ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC., et al
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
CASE NO. 6:09-CV-446
PATENT CASE
ORDER
The Court DENIES Plaintiff Eolas’ Unopposed Motion for Two Extra Pages to Responsd
to Defendants’ Replies (Docket No. 1042). The Local Rules’ page limits ease the burden of motion
practice on both the Court and the parties. This Court has hundreds of complex cases and deals with
a large number of motions each year. It has become common practice for parties to regularly expect
to exceed the District’s page limits on nearly all briefs filed in this Court, which has placed an
increased burden on the Court. Even small extensions combine to greatly increase the number of
pages of briefing the Court must digest, as well as ruling on all of the motions to exceed page limits.
Accordingly, the Court DENIES the motion. Further, the Court reminds the parties that all filings
in this Court shall be in 12-point, double-spaced, Times New Roman font with no less than 1 inch
margins.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 24th day of October, 2011.
__________________________________
LEONARD DAVIS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?