Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 1052

ORDER granting 1051 Motion to Expedite Briefing. Frito-Lay, Inc. shall file any brief in opposition to Plaintiffs Motion to Supplement Infringement Contentions no later than 11-04-2011; Plaintiffs shall file any reply brief no later than 11-09-2011; and Frito-Lay shall file any sur-reply brief no later than 11-14-2011. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 10/25/11. cc:attys 10-25-11 (mll, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION Eolas Technologies Incorporated, Plaintiff, vs. Adobe Systems Inc., et. al., Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 6:09-cv-446 Hon. Leonard E. Davis JURY TRIAL ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXPEDITED BRIEFING ON THEIR MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT THEIR P.R. 3-1 INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS WITH RESPECT TO FRITO-LAY’S HAPPINESS.LAYS.COM The Court, having considered Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion for Expedited Briefing on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to Supplement Their P.R. 3-1 Infringement Contentions with Respect to Frito-Lay’s Happiness.lays.com, which motion to expedite is not opposed by Defendant FritoLay, Inc., and finding good cause supporting it, finds the Motion should be granted. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Frito-Lay, Inc. file any brief in opposition to Plaintiffs’ motion no later than Friday, November 4, 2011, that Plaintiffs file any reply brief no later than Wednesday, November 9, 2011, and Frito-Lay file any sur-reply brief no later than Monday, November, 14 2011. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 25th day of October, 2011. __________________________________ LEONARD DAVIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?