Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al
Filing
106
ORDER granting 99 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Added attorney Matthew Douglas Powers for Amazon.com Inc. Attorney Jeffrey S Love terminated. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 12/15/09. cc:attys 12-16-09 (mll, )
Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al
Doc. 106
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, ADOBE SYSTEMS INC.; AMAZON.COM, INC.; APPLE INC.; BLOCKBUSTER INC.; CDW CORP.; CITIGROUP INC.; eBAY, INC.; FRITOLAY, INC.; THE GO DADDY GROUP, INC.; GOOGLE INC.; J.C. PENNY COMPANY, INC.; JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.; NEW FRONTIER MEDIA, INC.; OFFICE DEPOT, INC.; PEROT SYSTEMS CORP.; PLAYBOY ENTERPRISES INTERNATIONAL, INC.; RENT-A-CENTER, INC.; STAPLES, INC.; SUN MICROSYSTEMS INC.; TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC.; YAHOO! INC.; and YOUTUBE, LLC, Defendants. § § Civil Action No. 6:09-cv-446-LED § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § §
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT AMAZON.COM, INC.'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO WITHDRAW AND SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL Defendant Amazon.com, Inc. filed its Unopposed Motion to Withdraw and Substitute Counsel. The Court is of the opinion that such motion should be GRANTED. It is therefore ORDERED that Jeffrey S. Love and Richard D. McLeod of the firm Klarquist, Sparkman, LLP, 121 SW Salmon Street, Suite 1600, Portland, OR 97204, are withdrawn as counsel of record for Amazon in the above-captioned case, they shall be removed from the electronic service list in this case, and Matthew D. Powers of the firm Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, 201 Redwood Shores Parkway, Redwood Shores, CA 94065 is substituted as lead counsel for Amazon.
Dockets.Justia.com
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 15th day of December, 2009.
__________________________________ LEONARD DAVIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?