Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 1124

NOTICE by Frito-Lay, Inc. Request for Termination of Electronic Notices (McSwane, Douglas)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION Eolas Technologies Incorporated, Plaintiff, vs. Adobe Systems Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., Apple Inc., Argosy Publishing, Inc., Blockbuster Inc., CDW Corp., Citigroup Inc., eBay Inc., Frito-Lay, Inc., The Go Daddy Group, Inc., Google Inc., J.C. Penney Company, Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co., New Frontier Media, Inc., Office Depot, Inc., Perot Systems Corp., Playboy Enterprises International, Inc., Rent-A-Center, Inc., Staples, Inc., Sun Microsystems Inc., Texas Instruments Inc., Yahoo! Inc., and YouTube, LLC Defendants. § § § Civil Action No. 6:09-CV-00446-LED § § § § JURY TRIAL § § § § § § § § § § § § § REQUEST FOR TERMINATION OF ELECTRONIC NOTICES COMES NOW Douglas R. McSwane, Jr. of the firm Potter Minton, P.C. and hereby requests that the clerk of the Court remove his name from the list of persons authorized to receive electronic notices in this case pursuant to Local Rule CV-11(f). DATED: December 2, 2011 Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ Douglas R. McSwane, Jr. Douglas R. McSwane, Jr. State Bar No. 13861300 POTTER MINTON A Professional Corporation 110 N. College, Suite 500 Tyler, Texas 75702 903 597 8311 903 593 0846 (Facsimile) dougmcswane@potterminton.com {KJB/8971/0001/W0504520.1 } ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT FRITO-LAY, INC. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court’s CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on December 2, 2011. Any other counsel of record will be served by First Class U.S. mail on this same date. /s/ Douglas R. McSwane, Jr. Douglas R. McSwane, Jr. {KJB/8971/0001/W0504520.1 }

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?