Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al
Filing
1124
NOTICE by Frito-Lay, Inc. Request for Termination of Electronic Notices (McSwane, Douglas)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
Eolas Technologies Incorporated,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Adobe Systems Inc., Amazon.com, Inc.,
Apple Inc., Argosy Publishing, Inc.,
Blockbuster Inc., CDW Corp.,
Citigroup Inc., eBay Inc., Frito-Lay, Inc.,
The Go Daddy Group, Inc., Google Inc.,
J.C. Penney Company, Inc., JPMorgan
Chase & Co., New Frontier Media, Inc.,
Office Depot, Inc., Perot Systems Corp.,
Playboy Enterprises International, Inc.,
Rent-A-Center, Inc., Staples, Inc., Sun
Microsystems Inc., Texas Instruments Inc.,
Yahoo! Inc., and YouTube, LLC
Defendants.
§
§
§ Civil Action No. 6:09-CV-00446-LED
§
§
§
§
JURY TRIAL
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
REQUEST FOR TERMINATION OF
ELECTRONIC NOTICES
COMES NOW Douglas R. McSwane, Jr. of the firm Potter Minton, P.C. and hereby
requests that the clerk of the Court remove his name from the list of persons authorized to
receive electronic notices in this case pursuant to Local Rule CV-11(f).
DATED: December 2, 2011
Respectfully submitted,
By: /s/ Douglas R. McSwane, Jr.
Douglas R. McSwane, Jr. State
Bar No. 13861300
POTTER MINTON
A Professional Corporation
110 N. College, Suite 500
Tyler, Texas 75702
903 597 8311
903 593 0846 (Facsimile)
dougmcswane@potterminton.com
{KJB/8971/0001/W0504520.1 }
ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT
FRITO-LAY, INC.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned hereby certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have
consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the
Court’s CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on December 2, 2011. Any other
counsel of record will be served by First Class U.S. mail on this same date.
/s/ Douglas R. McSwane, Jr.
Douglas R. McSwane, Jr.
{KJB/8971/0001/W0504520.1 }
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?