Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 1263

ORDER denying 1118 Motion for Discovery; denying as moot 1133 Sealed Patent Motion for a Separate Trial; denying as moot 1134 Sealed Patent Motion for a Separate Trial; denying as moot 1158 Motion to Sever and for Separate Trial; denying 1159 Motion to Limit the Number of Asserted Claims for Trial; denying as moot 1169 Motion to Increase the Court's Limit of Designated Exhibits for Trial; denying as moot 1171 Sealed Motion for Separate trial or to Sever; denying as moot 1176 Motion for Leave to Designate Additional Exhibits; denying 1218 Sealed Motion for Jury Trial on Inequitable Conduct; denying as moot 1219 Sealed Patent Motion to Sever and for an Individual Trial; denying as moot 1226 Sealed Patent Motion to Sever and/or for Individual Trial; denying as moot 1242 Motion for Leave for Additional Time to Serve Certain Pretrial Documents; denying as moot 1252 Sealed Patent Motion to Sever and for a Separate Trial; denying as moot 1255 Motion for Leave to Exceed the Court's Standing Order; denying as moot 1256 Motion for Leave to Exceed the Court's Standing Order. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 01/20/12. cc:attys 1-20-12 (mll, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION

EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES
INCORPORATED,
Plaintiff,
vs.
ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC., et al.,
Defendants.

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

CASE NO. 6:09-CV-446

ORDER
As stated at the hearing on January 19, 2012, the Court rules on the following motions:
Yahoo!, Inc.’s Motion for a Separate Trial (Docket No. 1133) is DENIED AS
MOOT;
Amazon.com, Inc.’s Motion for a Separate Trial (Docket No. 1134) is DENIED AS
MOOT;
Adobe System Inc.’s Motion for Separate Trial or to Sever (Docket No. 1158) is
DENIED AS MOOT;
Staples, Inc.’s Motion for Separate Trial or to Sever (Docket No. 1171) is DENIED
AS MOOT;
Defendants Google, Inc. and YouTube LLC’s Motion to Sever and for an Individual
Trial (Docket No. 1219) is DENIED AS MOOT;
Defendant J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.’s Motion to Sever and/or for Individual
Trial (Docket No. 1226) is DENIED AS MOOT;
Defendants’ Motion to Limit the Number of Asserted Claims for Trial (Docket No.
1159) is DENIED;
Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion to Increase the Court’s Limit of Designated Exhibits
for Trial (Docket No. 1169) is DENIED AS MOOT without prejudice to refiling;
Defendants’ Motion for Leave to Designate Additional Exhibits (Docket No. 1176) is
DENIED AS MOOT without prejudice to refiling;
Google, Inc. and YouTube, LLC’s Motion for Leave for Additional Time to Serve
Certain Pre-Trial Documents (Docket No. 1242) is DENIED AS MOOT;
Defendants’ Motion for Jury Trial on Inequitable Conduct (Docket No. 1218) is
DENIED; and

Opposed Motion for Leave to Serve Discovery on Apple, Inc., Patrick Heynen, and
Los Alamos National Laboratory (Docket No. 1118) is DENIED.
Further, the Court ORDERS that Defendant CDW LLC’s Motion to Sever and for a Separate
Trial (Docket No. 1252) is DENIED AS MOOT; Defendants’ Unopposed Motion for Leave to
Exceed the Court’s Standing Order for Deposition Designations and Extend the Deadlines
Regarding Defendants’ Deposition Designations (Docket No. 1255) is DENIED AS MOOT;
and Defendants’ Unopposed Motion for Leave to Exceed the Court’s Standing Order for
Deposition Designations and Extend the Deadlines Regarding Defendants’ Deposition
Designations (Docket No. 1256) is DENIED AS MOOT without prejudice to refiling.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 20th day of January, 2012.

__________________________________
LEONARD DAVIS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2