Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 1283

NOTICE by J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc. re 1264 Order J.C. Penney's Objection to Final Trial Plan (Joe, Christopher)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION ) ) ) Plaintiff and Counterdefendant, ) ) vs. ) ) Adobe Systems Inc.; Amazon.com, Inc.; Apple Inc.; ) CDW Corp.; Citigroup Inc.; eBay Inc.; Frito-Lay, Inc.;) The Go Daddy Group, Inc.; Google Inc.; J.C. Penney ) Corporation, Inc.; JPMorgan Chase & Co.; New ) Frontier Media, Inc.; Office Depot, Inc.; Perot ) Systems Corp.; Playboy Enterprises International, ) Inc.; Rent-A-Center, Inc.; Staples, Inc.; Sun ) Microsystems, Inc.; Texas Instruments Inc.; Yahoo! ) Inc.; and YouTube, LLC, ) ) Defendants and Counterclaimants. ) ) Eolas Technologies Incorporated, Civil Action No. 6:09-CV-446-LED JURY TRIAL DEMANDED J.C. PENNEY’S OBJECTION TO FINAL TRIAL PLAN [DKT. NO. 1264] Defendant J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc. (“JCP”) respectfully objects to the January 20, 2012 Final Trial Plan (Dkt. No. 1264) and Order (Dkt. No. 1263) and joins in the Objection filed by Defendants Amazon and Yahoo (Dkt. No. 1274). 1. JCP joins in the following paragraphs of the Objection filed by Defendants Amazon and Yahoo for the same reasons and arguments asserted by them: 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. 2. JCP also joins in paragraph 6 of the Objection filed by Defendants Amazon and Yahoo to the extent the objection relates to the invalidity and inequitable conduct trial. 3. JCP further objects to the “time allotments” provided in the Plan as to JCP. The limitations of “voir dire” to 20 minutes per side, opening statement to 30 minutes per side, “direct/cross examination” to 12 hours per side, and “closing argument” per side in the J.C. PENNEY’S OBJECTIONS TO FINAL TRIAL PLAN Page 1 “Infringement and Damages” trial is unfairly prejudicial and infringes due process rights because it does not permit sufficient time for JCP to adequately present its case, particularly given the voluminous evidence, numerous witnesses, and complex factual and legal issues that must be presented and resolved in this case. Dated: January 23, 2012 Respectfully submitted, BUETHER JOE & CARPENTER, LLC By: /s/ Christopher M. Joe Christopher M. Joe (Lead Counsel) State Bar No. 00787770 Chris.Joe@BJCIPLaw.com Eric W. Buether State Bar No. 03316880 Eric.Buether@BJCIPLaw.com Brian A. Carpenter State Bar No. 03840600 Brian.Carpenter@BJCIPLaw.com Niky Bukovcan WA State Bar No. 39403 Niky.Bukovcan@BJCIPLaw.com 1700 Pacific Avenue Suite 2390 Dallas, Texas 75201 Telephone: (214) 466-1272 Facsimile: (214) 635-1828 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT J.C. PENNEY CORPORATION, INC. J.C. PENNEY’S OBJECTIONS TO FINAL TRIAL PLAN Page 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court’s CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a) on this 23rd day of January 2012. Any other counsel of record will be served by facsimile transmission and first class mail. /s/ Christopher M. Joe Christopher M. Joe J.C. PENNEY’S OBJECTIONS TO FINAL TRIAL PLAN Page 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?