Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 1337

Proposed Jury Instructions by Eolas Technologies Incorporated, The Regents of the University of California. (McKool, Mike)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION

EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES
INCORPORATED and
THE REGENTS OF THE
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA,
Plaintiff,
v.
ADOBE SYSTEMS INC., AMAZON.COM
INC., CDW CORPORATION, CITIGROUP
INC., THE GO DADDY GROUP, INC.,
GOOGLE INC., J.C. PENNEY
CORPORATION, INC., STAPLES, INC.,
YAHOO! INC., and YOUTUBE, LLC.,
Defendants.

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

CASE NO. 6:09-CV-00446-LED

JURY TRIAL

PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND AMENDMENTS TO THEIR
PROPOSED FINAL JURY INSTRUCTIONS
IN SECTION 5 OF DOCKET NUMBER NO. 1316-21
Plaintiffs Eolas Technologies Inc. and the Regents of the University of California submit the
following second amendments to their proposed final jury instructions in Section 5 of the parties’
Joint Proposed Final Jury Instructions for Invalidity Trial, Docket Number 1316-2.
With respect to Plaintiffs’ proposal in 5.1 of Docket Number 1316-2, Plaintiffs propose the
following substitution of the word “claim” for the word “patent,” as shown below in yellow:

5.

INVALIDITY

1

Plaintiffs reserve the right to modify or amend these proposed instructions prior to the Court’s
charge conference if so warranted.
McKool 409107v2

5.1.

INVALIDITY GENERALLY

]
Even though the PTO examiner has allowed the
claims of a patent, you have the ultimate responsibility for deciding whether the claims of the patent
are valid. In this case, Defendants contend that the asserted claims of the ’906 and ’985 patents are
invalid as anticipated or obvious, and not supported by the written description in the patent.

2

3

4

McKool 409107v2

2

5

6

McKool 409107v2

3

7

McKool 409107v2

4

8

9

McKool 409107v2

5

DATED: February 7, 2012.

MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.

/s/ Mike McKool
Mike McKool
Lead Attorney
Texas State Bar No. 13732100
[e-mail]
Douglas Cawley
Texas State Bar No. 04035500
[e-mail]
Rosemary T. Snider
Texas State Bar No. 18796500
[e-mail]
Holly Engelmann
Texas State Bar No. 24040865
[e-mail]
MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.
300 Crescent Court, Suite 1500
Dallas, Texas 75201
[phone]
[phone]
Kevin L. Burgess
Texas State Bar No. 24006927
[e-mail]
Josh W. Budwin
Texas State Bar No. 24050347
[e-mail]
Gretchen K. Curran
Texas State Bar No. 2405-5979
[e-mail]
Matthew B. Rappaport
Texas State Bar No. 24070472
[e-mail]
J.R. Johnson
Texas State Bar No. 24070000
[e-mail]
MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.
300 West Sixth Street, Suite 1700
Austin, Texas 78701
[phone]
[phone]

McKool 409107v2

6

Robert M. Parker
Texas State Bar No. 15498000
[e-mail]
Robert Christopher Bunt
Texas Bar No. 00787165
[e-mail]
Andrew T. Gorham
Texas State Bar No. 24012715
[e-mail]
PARKER, BUNT & AINSWORTH, P.C.
100 E. Ferguson, Suite 1114
Tyler, Texas 75702
[phone]
[phone] FAX
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS
EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES INC.
AND THE REGENTS OF THE
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

McKool 409107v2

7

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was filed electronically in compliance
with Local Rule CV-5(a). This document was served on all counsel by email on February 7, 2012.

/s/John Campbell
John Campbell

McKool 409107v2

8