Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 1359

ORDER granting 1358 Motion to Dismiss. All claims and counterclaims between Plaintiffs and Defendant Staples, Inc., are hereby dismissed with prejudice pursuant to and in accordance with the Settlement Agreement. Each of the foregoing parties shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees with respect to these claims. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 02/23/12. cc:attys 2-23-12 (mll, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES § INCORPORATED and THE REGENTS § OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA § § Plaintiffs, § § vs. § § ADOBE SYSTEMS INC., AMAZON.COM § INC., CDW CORPORATION, CITIGROUP § INC., THE GO DADDY GROUP, INC., § GOOGLE INC., J.C. PENNEY § CORPORATION, INC., STAPLES, INC., § YAHOO! INC., and YOUTUBE, LLC., § § Defendants. § CASE NO. 6:09-CV-00446-LED JURY TRIAL ORDER AND JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL IT IS ORDERED that the Joint Motion to Dismiss Between Eolas Technologies Incorporated, The Regents of the University of California and Staples, Inc. IS HEREBY GRANTED and all claims by Plaintiffs Eolas Technologies Incorporated and The Regents of the University of California against Defendant Staples, Inc., and all claims by Staples, Inc. against Eolas Technologies Incorporated and The Regents of the University of California, are hereby dismissed with prejudice pursuant to and in accordance with a Confidential Settlement and License Agreement dated February 7, 2012 and a Settlement Agreement dated February 7, 2012. Each of the foregoing parties shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees with respect to these claims. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. McKool 410432v1 So ORDERED and SIGNED this 23rd day of February, 2012. __________________________________ LEONARD DAVIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?