Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al
Filing
144
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Google Inc. identifying Corporate Parent None for Google Inc.. (Jones, Michael)
Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al
Doc. 144
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, v. ADOBE SYSTEMS INC., ET AL, Defendants. Hon. Leonard E. Davis JURY CASE NO. 6:09-cv-446
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT OF GOOGLE INC. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, Defendant Google Inc. declares that it is a publicly traded company. It has no parent corporation, and no publicly traded corporation owns more than 10% of its stock.
1
Dockets.Justia.com
Dated: December 17, 2009
Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ Scott T. Weingaertner, with permission by Michael E. Jones _____________________ Michael E. Jones State Bar No. 10929400 Allen F. Gardner State Bar No. 24043679 POTTER MINTON A Professional Corporation 110 N. College, Suite 500 (75702) P.O. Box 359 Tyler, Texas 75710 (903) 597-8311 (903) 593-0846 (Facsimile) mikejones@potterminton.com allengardner@potterminton.com
Of Counsel: Scott T. Weingaertner sweingaertner@kslaw.com Robert F. Perry rperry@kslaw.com Christopher C. Carnaval ccarnaval@kslaw.com Mark H. Francis mfrancis@kslaw.com KING & SPALDING LLP 1185 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036-4003 Telephone: (212) 556-2100 Facsimile: (212) 556-2222
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned hereby certifies that counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT OF GOOGLE INC. via the Court's CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on this the 17th day of December 2009. Any other counsel of record will be served via First Class U.S. Mail on this same date. /s/ Michael E. Jones
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?