Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 16

ORDER granting 8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Playboy Enterprises International Inc shall have through 12-17-2009 to answer or otherwise respond to pltf's Complaint for Patent Infringement. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 10/19/09. cc:attys 10-19-09 (mll, )

Download PDF
Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al Doc. 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER D I V I S I O N EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED Plaintiff, v. ADOBE SYSTEMS INC.; AMAZON.COM, INC.; APPLE INC.; BLOCKBUSTER INC.; CDW CORP.; CITIGROUP INC.; eBAY, INC.; FRITO-LAY, INC.; THE GO DADDY GROUP, INC.; GOOGLE INC.; J.C. PENNY COMPANY, INC.; JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.; NEW FRONTIER MEDIA, INC.; OFFICE DEPOT, INC.; PEROT SYSTEM CORP.; PLAYBOY ENTERPRISES INTERNATIONAL, INC.; RENT-A-CENTER, INC.; STAPLES, INC.; SUN MICROSYSTEMS INC.; TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC.; YAHOO! INC.; and YOUTUBE, LLC Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:09-cv-446 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT PLAYBOY ENTERPRISES INTERNATIONAL, INC.'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Defendant Playboy Enterprises International, Inc. filed it Unopposed Motion for an Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint through December 17, 2009. The Court is of the opinion that such motion should be GRANTED. It is therefore ORDERED that Playboy Enterprises International, Inc. shall have through December 17, 2009 to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint for Patent Infringement. Dockets.Justia.com So ORDERED and SIGNED this 19th day of October, 2009. __________________________________ LEONARD DAVIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?