Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 34

NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Debra Elaine Gunter on behalf of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (Gunter, Debra)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION Eolas Technologies Incorporated, § § Plaintiff, § § vs. § § Adobe Systems Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., § Apple Inc., Argosy Publishing, Inc., § Blockbuster Inc., CDW Corp., § Citigroup Inc., eBay Inc., Frito-Lay, Inc., § The Go Daddy Group, Inc., Google Inc., § J.C. Penney Company, Inc., JPMorgan § Chase & Co., New Frontier Media , Inc., § Office Depot, Inc., Perot Systems Corp., § Playboy Enterprises International, Inc., § Rent-A-Center, Inc., Staples, Inc., Sun § Microsystems Inc., Texas Instruments § Inc., Yahoo! Inc., and YouTube, LLC § § Defendants § Civil Action No. 6:09-cv-446 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT JP MORGAN CHASE & CO. Defendant, JP Morgan Chase & Co. notifies the Court and the parties of the appearance of Debby E. Gunter as counsel on its behalf. Defendant respectfully requests that Ms. Gunter, who is enrolled in the Court's CM/ECF system and whose contact information is set forth below, be included on the Court's and parties' service lists. DATED: October 21, 2009 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Debby E. Gunter Debby E. Gunter Bar No. 24012752 YARBROUGH WILCOX, PLLC 100 E. Ferguson St., Ste. 1015 Tyler, TX 75702 (903) 595-3111 Fax: (903) 595-0191 debby@yw-lawfirm.com Attorney for Defendant, JP Morgan Chase & Co. Certificate of Service The undersigned hereby certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court's CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on this 21st day of October, 2009. All other counsel not deemed to have consented to service in such manner will be served via facsimile transmission and/or first class mail. /s/ Debby E. Gunter Debby E. Gunter

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?