Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 344

ORDER granting 332 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Rolling Document Production Pursuant to 2(B) of The Joint Agreed Discovery Order. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Apple's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Rolling Document Production Pursuant to 2(B) of the Joint Agreed Discovery Order is hereby GRANTED, and that Apple has until September 29, 2010, to complete its rolling document production pursuant to Paragraph 2(B) of the Joint Agreed Discovery Order. No other deadline applicable to this litigation is affected by this Order. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 6/24/2010. (kls, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, vs. ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL., Defendants. AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS Civil Action No. 6:09-cv-446-LED ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT APPLE INC.'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLETE ROLLING DOCUMENT PRODUCTION PURSUANT TO ¶ 2(B) OF THE JOINT AGREED DISCOVERY ORDER The Court, having considered Defendant Apple Inc.'s ("Apple") Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Rolling Document Production Pursuant to ¶ 2(B) of the Joint Agreed Discovery Order, and finding good cause supporting it, finds the Motion should be granted. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Apple's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Rolling Document Production Pursuant to ¶ 2(B) of the Joint Agreed Discovery Order is hereby GRANTED, and that Apple has until September 29, 2010, to complete its rolling document production pursuant to Paragraph 2(B) of the Joint Agreed Discovery Order [Docket No. 247]. No other deadline applicable to this litigation is affected by this Order. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 24th day of June, 2010. __________________________________ 1 LEONARD DAVIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?