Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al
Filing
362
ORDER granting 361 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery. Playboy shall have to 8-09-2010 to comply with PR 3-4(a) to produce source code and complete the rolling production of documents as required by the Joint Agreed Discovery Order. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 07/13/10. cc:attys 7-13-10 (mll, )
Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al
Doc. 362
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION Eolas Technologies Incorporated, Plaintiff, v. Adobe Systems Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., Apple Inc., Argosy Publishing, Inc., Blockbuster Inc., CDW Corp., Citigroup Inc., eBay Inc., Frito-Lay, Inc., The Go Daddy Group, Inc., Google Inc., J.C. Penny Company, Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co., New Frontier Media, Inc., Office Depot, Inc., Perot Systems Corp., Playboy Enterprises International, Inc., Rent-A-Center, Inc., Staples, Inc., Sun Microsystems Inc., Texas Instruments, Inc., Yahoo! Inc., and YouTube, LLC Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § §
C.A. NO. 6:09-CV-446 (LED)
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT PLAYBOY ENTERPRISES INTERNATIONAL, INC'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLETE CERTAIN DISCOVERY The Court, having considered the motion of Defendant Playboy Enterprises International, Inc. ("Playboy") to extend certain discovery deadlines and finding no objection to it, hereby GRANTS the motion. IT IS ORDERED that Playboy shall have until August 9, 2010 to comply with P.R. 34(a) and to produce source code and complete the rolling production of documents as required by paragraph 2(B) of the Joint Agreed Discovery Order.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 13th day of July, 2010.
US 466685v.1
__________________________________ LEONARD DAVIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dockets.Justia.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?