Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 40

ORDER granting 35 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. JP Morgan Chase & Co have through and including 12-17-2009, in which to answer, move or otherwise respond to pltf's Complaint for Patent Infringement. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 10/22/09. cc:attys 10-22-09 (mll, )

Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Doc. 40

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION Eolas Technologies Incorporated, § § Plaintiff, § § vs. § § Adobe Systems Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., § Apple Inc., Argosy Publishing, Inc., § Blockbuster Inc., CDW Corp., § Citigroup Inc., eBay Inc., Frito-Lay, Inc., § The Go Daddy Group, Inc., Google Inc., § J.C. Penney Company, Inc., JPMorgan § Chase & Co., New Frontier Media , Inc., § Office Depot, Inc., Perot Systems Corp., § Playboy Enterprises International, Inc., § Rent-A-Center, Inc., Staples, Inc., Sun § Microsystems Inc., Texas Instruments § Inc., Yahoo! Inc., and YouTube, LLC § § Defendants §

Civil Action No. 6:09-cv-446

Order Granting Defendant's Unopposed Motion For Extension of Time in Which to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint for Patent Infringement After considering Defendant, JP Morgan Chase & Co.'s, Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time in Which to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint for Patent Infringement, the Court finds that the motion should be granted. It is, therefore, Ordered that JP Morgan Chase & Co. have through and including December 17, 2009 in which to answer, move or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint for Patent Infringement.

Dockets.Justia.com

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 22nd day of October, 2009.

__________________________________ LEONARD DAVIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE