Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al
NOTICE by Google Inc., YouTube, LLC of Compliance regarding Privilege Log (Jones, Michael)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES INC., Plaintiff, v. ADOBE SYSTEMS INC., et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:09-CV-446 Hon. Leonard E. Davis JURY
DEFENDANTS GOOGLE INC. AND YOUTUBE, LLC'S NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE REGARDING PRIVILEGE LOG Defendants Google Inc. ("Google") and YouTube, LLC ("YouTube") hereby notify the Court that on December 8, 2010, they served Plaintiff's counsel of record with a Privilege Log, via electronic mail, in accordance with the Court's Discovery Order entered in this matter on April 9, 2010 [Dkt. #249] and the October 29, 2010 Order granting the Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Certain Discovery [Dkt. #477]. Dated: December 9, 2010 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Michael E. Jones Michael E. Jones State Bar No. 10929400 firstname.lastname@example.org Allen F. Gardner State Bar No. 24043679 email@example.com POTTER MINTON A Professional Corporation 110 N. College, Suite 500 Tyler, Texas 75702 Telephone: (903) 597-8311 Facsimile: (903) 593-0846
Scott T. Weingaertner firstname.lastname@example.org Robert F. Perry email@example.com Christopher C. Carnaval firstname.lastname@example.org Mark H. Francis email@example.com KING & SPALDING LLP 1185 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036-4003 Telephone: (212) 556-2100 Facsimile: (212) 556-2222 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS GOOGLE INC. AND YOUTUBE, LLC CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court's CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on this 9th day of December 2010. Any other counsel of record will be served via First Class U.S. Mail on this same date. /s/ Michael E. Jones___________________ Michael E. Jones
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?