Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 63

ORDER granting 45 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Blockbuster shall have through 12-17-2009 to answer or otherwise respond to pltf's Complaint for Patent Infringement. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 10/26/09. cc:attys 10-26-09(mll, )

Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Doc. 63

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED Plaintiff, v. ADOBE SYSTEMS INC.; AMAZON.COM, INC.; APPLE INC.; BLOCKBUSTER INC.; CDW CORP.; CITIGROUP INC.; eBAY, INC.; FRITO-LAY, INC.; THE GO DADDY GROUP, INC.; GOOGLE INC.; J.C. PENNY COMPANY, INC.; JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.; NEW FRONTIER MEDIA, INC.; OFFICE DEPOT, INC.; PEROT SYSTEM CORP.; BLOCKBUSTER ENTERPRISES INTERNATIONAL, INC.; RENT-A-CENTER, INC.; STAPLES, INC.; SUN MICROSYSTEMS INC.; TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC.; YAHOO! INC.; and YOUTUBE, LLC Defendants. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT BLOCKBUSTER INC.'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Defendant Blockbuster Inc. filed it Unopposed Motion for an Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint through December 17, 2009. The Court is of the opinion that such motion should be GRANTED. It is therefore ORDERED that Blockbuster Inc. shall have through December 17, 2009 to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint for Patent Infringement. § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § §

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:09-cv-446 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Dockets.Justia.com

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 26th day of October, 2009.

__________________________________ LEONARD DAVIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE