Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al
Filing
643
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Natalie A. Bennett on behalf of Office Depot, Inc. (Bennett, Natalie)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
Eolas Technologies Incorporated,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
Adobe Systems Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., Apple )
Inc., Argosy Publishing, Inc., Blockbuster Inc., )
CDW Corp., Citigroup Inc., eBay Inc., Frito)
Lay, Inc., The Go Daddy Group, Inc., Google
)
Inc., J.C. Penney Company, Inc., JPMorgan
)
Chase & Co., New Frontier Media, Inc., Office )
Depot, Inc., Perot Systems Corp., Playboy
)
Enterprises International, Inc., Rent-A-Center, )
Inc., Staples, Inc., Sun Microsystems Inc.,
)
Texas Instruments Inc., Yahoo! Inc., and
)
YouTube, LLC,
)
)
Defendants.
)
Case No. 6:09-cv-446
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
The Honorable Leonard Davis
United States District Judge
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL
Defendant Office Depot, Inc. (“Office Depot”) files this Notice of Appearance, and
hereby notifies the Court that Natalie A. Bennett enters her appearance in this matter as counsel
for Office Depot for the purpose of receiving notices and orders from the Court. Natalie Bennett
was admitted to practice in the Eastern District of Texas on July 7, 2010.
Dated: May 3, 2011
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Natalie A. Bennett
Natalie A. Bennett
MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP
227 West Monroe
Chicago, IL 60614
Ph: 312.372.2000
Email: nbennett@mwe.com
Attorney for Office Depot, Inc.
-2-
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned hereby certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have
consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court’s
CM-ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3). Any other counsel of record will be served by
overnight delivery or first class mail this same date.
/s/ Natalie A. Bennett
Natalie A. Bennett
DM_US 26577492-1.052772.0127
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?