Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 670

ORDER granting 666 Motion to Amend/Correct Docket Control Order. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 05/26/11. cc:attys 5-27-11 (mll, )

Case 6:09-cv-00446-LED Document 666-1

Filed 05/24/11 Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
Eolas Technologies Incorporated,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Adobe Systems Inc., Amazon.com, Inc.,
Apple Inc., Argosy Publishing, Inc.,
Blockbuster Inc., CDW Corp.,
Citigroup Inc., eBay Inc., Frito-Lay, Inc.,
The Go Daddy Group, Inc., Google Inc.,
J.C. Penney Company, Inc., JPMorgan
Chase & Co., New Frontier Media, Inc.,
Office Depot, Inc., Perot Systems Corp.,
Playboy Enterprises International, Inc.,
Rent-A-Center, Inc., Staples, Inc., Sun
Microsystems Inc., Texas Instruments Inc.,
Yahoo! Inc., and YouTube, LLC
Defendants.

§
§
§ Civil Action No. 6:09-CV-00446-LED
§
§
§
§
JURY TRIAL
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO MEET CERTAIN
DEADLINES
The Court having considered the parties’ Joint Unopposed Motion For Extension Of
Time To Meet Certain Deadlines (“Motion”), and finding good cause supporting it, finds the
Motion should be granted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the following deadlines are now in place, replacing
deadlines for the same previously issued by the Court in Dkts. 249 and 603:

Austin 67649v1

Case 6:09-cv-00446-LED Document 666-1

Filed 05/24/11 Page 2 of 2

08/19/2011

Responses to Dispositive Motions (including Daubert motions) due.
Responses to dispositive motions filed prior to the dispositive motion
deadline, including Daubert motions, shall be due in accordance with
Local Rule CV-56 and Local Rule CV-7. Motions to extend page limits
will only be granted in exceptional circumstances.

08/05/2011

Dispositive Motions due from all parties and any other motions that
may require a hearing (including Daubert motions) due. Motions shall
comply with Local Rule CV-56 and Local Rule CV-7. Motions to extend
page limits will only be granted in exceptional circumstances.

08/08/2011

Parties to Identify Rebuttal Trial Witnesses.

07/29/2011

Parties to Identify Trial Witnesses; Amend Pleadings (after Markman
Hearing). It is not necessary to file a Motion for Leave to Amend before
the deadline to amend pleadings. It is necessary to file a Motion for
Leave to Amend after the deadline. However, except as provided in
Patent Rule 3-6, if the amendment would effect infringement contentions
or invalidity contentions, a motion must be made pursuant to Patent Rule
3-6 irrespective of whether the amendment is made prior to this deadline.

08/12/2011

Discovery Deadline.

07/29/2011

Parties designate rebuttal expert witnesses (non-construction issues),
Rebuttal expert witness reports due. Refer to Local Rules for required
information.

06/24/2011

Parties with burden of proof designate expert witnesses (non-construction
issues). Expert witness reports due. Refer to Local Rules for required
information.

No other deadline applicable to this litigation is affected by this Order.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 26th day of May, 2011.

__________________________________
LEONARD DAVIS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Austin 67649v1