Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al
Filing
687
NOTICE by JPMorgan Chase & Co. Request for Termination of Electronic Notices (Yarbrough, Herbert)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
Eolas Technologies Incorporated,
§
§
Plaintiff,
§
§
vs.
§
§
Adobe Systems Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., §
Apple Inc., Argosy Publishing, Inc.,
§
Blockbuster Inc., CDW Corp.,
§
Citigroup Inc., eBay Inc., Frito-Lay, Inc., §
The Go Daddy Group, Inc., Google Inc., §
J.C. Penney Company, Inc., JPMorgan §
Chase & Co., New Frontier Media , Inc., §
Office Depot, Inc., Perot Systems Corp., §
Playboy Enterprises International, Inc., §
Rent-A-Center, Inc., Staples, Inc., Sun §
Microsystems Inc., Texas Instruments §
Inc., Yahoo! Inc., and YouTube, LLC
§
§
Defendants
§
Civil Action No. 6:09-cv-446
NOTICE OF REQUEST FOR TERMINATION OF ELECTRONIC NOTICES
COME NOW Trey Yarbrough and Debby E. Gunter of YARBROUGH ♦
WILCOX, PLLC, and hereby request that the clerk of the Court remove their names
from the list of persons authorized to receive electronic notices in this case pursuant to
Local Rule CV-11(f).
DATED: June 7, 2011
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Trey Yarbrough
Trey Yarbrough
Bar No. 22133500
Debby E. Gunter
Bar No. 24012752
YARBROUGH ♦ WILCOX, PLLC
100 E. Ferguson St., Ste. 1015
Tyler, TX 75702
(903) 595-3111
Fax: (903) 595-0191
trey@yw-lawfirm.com
debby@yw-lawfirm.com
Attorneys for Defendant, JP Morgan
Chase & Co.
Certificate of Service
The undersigned hereby certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to
have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document
via the Court’s CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on this 7th day of June,
2011. All other counsel not deemed to have consented to service in such manner will
be served via facsimile transmission and/or first class mail.
/s/ Trey Yarbrough
Trey Yarbrough
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?