Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 687

NOTICE by JPMorgan Chase & Co. Request for Termination of Electronic Notices (Yarbrough, Herbert)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION Eolas Technologies Incorporated, § § Plaintiff, § § vs. § § Adobe Systems Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., § Apple Inc., Argosy Publishing, Inc., § Blockbuster Inc., CDW Corp., § Citigroup Inc., eBay Inc., Frito-Lay, Inc., § The Go Daddy Group, Inc., Google Inc., § J.C. Penney Company, Inc., JPMorgan § Chase & Co., New Frontier Media , Inc., § Office Depot, Inc., Perot Systems Corp., § Playboy Enterprises International, Inc., § Rent-A-Center, Inc., Staples, Inc., Sun § Microsystems Inc., Texas Instruments § Inc., Yahoo! Inc., and YouTube, LLC § § Defendants § Civil Action No. 6:09-cv-446 NOTICE OF REQUEST FOR TERMINATION OF ELECTRONIC NOTICES COME NOW Trey Yarbrough and Debby E. Gunter of YARBROUGH ♦ WILCOX, PLLC, and hereby request that the clerk of the Court remove their names from the list of persons authorized to receive electronic notices in this case pursuant to Local Rule CV-11(f). DATED: June 7, 2011 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Trey Yarbrough Trey Yarbrough Bar No. 22133500 Debby E. Gunter Bar No. 24012752 YARBROUGH ♦ WILCOX, PLLC 100 E. Ferguson St., Ste. 1015 Tyler, TX 75702 (903) 595-3111 Fax: (903) 595-0191 trey@yw-lawfirm.com debby@yw-lawfirm.com Attorneys for Defendant, JP Morgan Chase & Co. Certificate of Service The undersigned hereby certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court’s CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on this 7th day of June, 2011. All other counsel not deemed to have consented to service in such manner will be served via facsimile transmission and/or first class mail. /s/ Trey Yarbrough Trey Yarbrough

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?