Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 7

ORDER granting 5 Defendants' Google, Inc. and Youtube, LLC's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint for Patent Infringement. It is therefore ORDERED that Google Inc. and YouTube, LLC shall have through December 17, 2009 to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs Complaint for Patent Infringement. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 10/14/2009. (kls, )

Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Doc. 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED § § v. § § ADOBE SYSTEMS INC.; § AMAZON.COM, INC.; APPLE INC.; § ARGOSY PUBLISHING, INC.; § BLOCKBUSTER INC.; CDW CORP.; § CITIGROUP INC.; eBAY, INC.; § FRITO-LAY, INC.; § THE GO DADDY GROUP, INC.; § GOOGLE INC.; J.C. PENNEY COMPANY, INC.; § JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.; § NEW FRONTIER MEDIA, INC.; § OFFICE DEPO, INC.; PEROT SYSTEMS CORP.; § PLAYBOY ENTERPRISES § INTERNATIONAL, INC.; § RENT-A-CENTER, INC.; STAPLES, INC.; § SUN MICROSYSTEMS INC.; § TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC.; § YAHOO! INC.; and YOUTUBE, LLC §

Civil Action No. 6:09-cv-446 Jury Trial Demanded

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS GOOGLE INC. AND YOUTUBE, LLC'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Defendants Google Inc. and YouTube, LLC filed its Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint through December 17, 2009. The Court is of the opinion that such motion should be GRANTED. It is therefore ORDERED that Google Inc. and YouTube, LLC shall have through December 17, 2009 to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint for Patent Infringement.

{A07\NEW\NEW\W0406779.1 }

Dockets.Justia.com

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 14th day of October, 2009.

__________________________________ LEONARD DAVIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE