Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al
Filing
717
ORDER granting 713 Motion to Expedite Briefing. Deft Adobe Systems shall file any brief in opposition to pltf's Motion to Compel Discovery no later than 6-24-2011, and pltf shall file any reply brief no later than 6-27-2011. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 06/21/11. cc:attys 6-21-11 (mll, )
Case 6:09-cv-00446-LED Document 713-1
Filed 06/20/11 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
Eolas Technologies Incorporated,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Adobe Systems Inc., Amazon.com, Inc.,
Apple Inc., Argosy Publishing, Inc.,
Blockbuster Inc., CDW Corp.,
Citigroup Inc., eBay Inc., Frito-Lay, Inc.,
The Go Daddy Group, Inc., Google Inc.,
J.C. Penney Company, Inc., JPMorgan
Chase & Co., New Frontier Media, Inc.,
Office Depot, Inc., Perot Systems Corp.,
Playboy Enterprises International, Inc.,
Rent-A-Center, Inc., Staples, Inc., Sun
Microsystems Inc., Texas Instruments Inc.,
Yahoo! Inc., and YouTube, LLC
Defendants.
§
§
§ Civil Action No. 6:09-CV-00446-LED
§
§
§
§
JURY TRIAL
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXPEDITED BRIEFING
ON EOLAS’ MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY FROM
ADOBE SYSTEMS INC. REGARDING INVESTMENT/LICENSING
AGREEMENTS WITH INTELLECTUAL VENTURES ENTITIES
The Court, having considered Eolas Technologies Inc.’s (“Plaintiff”) Unopposed Motion
for Expedited Briefing on Eolas’ Motion to Compel Discovery from Adobe Systems Inc.
Regarding Investment Licensing Agreements with Intellectual Ventures Entities and finding
good cause supporting it, finds the Motion should be granted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant file any brief in opposition to Plaintiff’s
motion no later than June 24, 2011, and that Plaintiff file any reply brief no later than June 27,
2011.
Dallas 325107v1
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 21st day of June, 2011.
__________________________________
LEONARD DAVIS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?