Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 75

ORDER granting 70 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Deft J.C. Penney Corporation Inc shall have until 12-17-2009 to answer or otherwise respond to pltf's Original Complaint for Patent Infringement. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 10/28/09. cc:attys 10-29-09 (mll, )

Download PDF
Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al Doc. 75 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION Eolas Technologies Incorporated, Plaintiff, v. Adobe Systems, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., apple Inc., Argosy Publishing, Inc., Blockbuster Inc., CDW Corp., Citigroup Inc., eBay Inc., Frito-Lay, Inc., The Go Daddy Group, Inc., Google Inc., J.C. Penney Company, Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co, New Frongier Media, Inc., Office Depot, Inc., Perot Systems Corp., Playboy Enterprises International, Inc., Rent-ACenter, Inc., Staples, Inc., Sun Microsystems Inc., Texas Instruments Inc., Yahoo! Inc., and YouTube, LLC Defendants. ORDER Before the Court is Defendant J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.'s (incorrectly identified above as J.C. Penney Company, Inc.) ("J.C. Penney") unopposed motion seeking an extension of time to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Original Complaint for Patent Infringement in the above-referenced cause until December 17, 2009. After considering the motion, and that Plaintiff has agreed to the extension, the Court finds that it is well taken and is hereby GRANTED. Accordingly, Defendant J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc. shall have until and including December 17, 2009 to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Original Complaint for Patent Infringement. § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 6:09-cv-446 149989 Dockets.Justia.com So ORDERED and SIGNED this 28th day of October, 2009. __________________________________ LEONARD DAVIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?