Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 765

NOTICE by Rent-A-Center, Inc. Rent-A-Center, Inc.'s Request for Termination of Electronic Notices (Warren, Sanford)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES INC., Plaintiff, v. ADOBE SYSTEMS INC., et al., Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:09-cv-00446-LED Jury Trial Demanded RENT-A-CENTER, INC.’S REQUEST FOR TERMINATION OF ELECTRONIC NOTICES Pursuant to Local Rule CV-11(f), counsel for Rent-A-Center, Inc. (“RAC”), Sanford E. Warren, Jr., R. Scott Rhoades, and Jonathan Hart Rastegar of the firm Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, respectfully request that the clerk of the Court remove their names from the list of persons authorized to receive electronic notices in this case. RAC is no longer a party to the case due to the Order of dismissal dated July 7, 2011 (Dkt. No. 758). RENT-A-CENTER, INC.’S REQUEST FOR TERMINATION OF ELECTRONIC NOTICES PAGE 1 Dated: July 12, 2011 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Sanford E. Warren, Jr. Sanford E. Warren, Jr. (lead attorney) Texas State Bar No. 20888690 swarren@akingump.com R. Scott Rhoades Texas State Bar No. 90001757 srhoades@akingump.com Jonathan Hart Rastegar Texas State Bar No. 24064043 jrastegar@akingump.com AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP 1700 Pacific Avenue, Suite 4100 Dallas, Texas 75201 (214) 969-2800 (telephone) (214) 969-4343 (facsimile) ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT RENT-A-CENTER, INC. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that the foregoing document was filed electronically on the 12th day of July, 2011, in compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a) and has been served on all counsel who have consented to electronic service and all other counsel by U.S. First Class Mail. /s/ Sanford E. Warren, Jr. Sanford E. Warren, Jr. RENT-A-CENTER, INC.’S REQUEST FOR TERMINATION OF ELECTRONIC NOTICES PAGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?