Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al
Filing
765
NOTICE by Rent-A-Center, Inc. Rent-A-Center, Inc.'s Request for Termination of Electronic Notices (Warren, Sanford)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
ADOBE SYSTEMS INC., et al.,
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:09-cv-00446-LED
Jury Trial Demanded
RENT-A-CENTER, INC.’S
REQUEST FOR TERMINATION OF ELECTRONIC NOTICES
Pursuant to Local Rule CV-11(f), counsel for Rent-A-Center, Inc. (“RAC”), Sanford E.
Warren, Jr., R. Scott Rhoades, and Jonathan Hart Rastegar of the firm Akin Gump Strauss Hauer
& Feld LLP, respectfully request that the clerk of the Court remove their names from the list of
persons authorized to receive electronic notices in this case. RAC is no longer a party to the case
due to the Order of dismissal dated July 7, 2011 (Dkt. No. 758).
RENT-A-CENTER, INC.’S
REQUEST FOR TERMINATION OF ELECTRONIC NOTICES
PAGE 1
Dated: July 12, 2011
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Sanford E. Warren, Jr.
Sanford E. Warren, Jr. (lead attorney)
Texas State Bar No. 20888690
swarren@akingump.com
R. Scott Rhoades
Texas State Bar No. 90001757
srhoades@akingump.com
Jonathan Hart Rastegar
Texas State Bar No. 24064043
jrastegar@akingump.com
AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP
1700 Pacific Avenue, Suite 4100
Dallas, Texas 75201
(214) 969-2800 (telephone)
(214) 969-4343 (facsimile)
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT
RENT-A-CENTER, INC.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that the foregoing document was filed electronically on the 12th day of
July, 2011, in compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a) and has been served on all counsel who have
consented to electronic service and all other counsel by U.S. First Class Mail.
/s/ Sanford E. Warren, Jr.
Sanford E. Warren, Jr.
RENT-A-CENTER, INC.’S
REQUEST FOR TERMINATION OF ELECTRONIC NOTICES
PAGE 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?