Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 771

NOTICE of Intent to Request Redaction by Christopher Michael Joe re 762 Transcript,,,. (Joe, Christopher)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, vs. ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED, et al. Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 6:09-cv-00446-LED Jury Trial Demanded DEFENDANT J.C. PENNEY CORPORATION, INC.’S NOTICE OF INTENT TO REQUEST REDACTION Pursuant to Local Rule CV 5.2, Defendant J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc. (“JCP”) notifies the Court, the Court Reporter and the parties that it intends to request redaction of certain portions of the official transcript of the Motion Hearing held on June 29, 2011, before Judge Davis which was reported by Ms. Shea Sloan. A motion to redact will be filed with the court within 21 days from the filing of the electronic transcript with the Clerk of Court. J.C. PENNEY CORPORATION, INC.’S NOTICE OF INTENT TO REQUEST REDACTION Page 1 Dated: July 14, 2011 BUETHER JOE & CARPENTER, LLC By: /s/ Christopher M. Joe Christopher M. Joe State Bar No. 00787770 Chris.Joe@BJCIPLaw.com Eric W. Buether State Bar No. 03316880 Eric.Buether@BJCIPLaw.com Niky Bukovcan WA State Bar No. 39403 Niky.Bukovcan@BJCIPLaw.com 1700 Pacific, Suite 2390 Dallas, Texas 75201 Telephone: (214) 466-1272 Facsimile: (214) 635-1828 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT J.C. PENNEY CORPORATION, INC. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court’s CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a) on this 14th day of July 2011. Any other counsel of record will be served by facsimile transmission and first class mail. /s/ Christopher M. Joe Christopher M. Joe J.C. PENNEY CORPORATION, INC.’S NOTICE OF INTENT TO REQUEST REDACTION Page 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?