Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 848

NOTICE of Discovery Disclosure by Google Inc., YouTube, LLC Second Amended Initial Disclosure Statement (Jones, Michael)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES INC., ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. ADOBE SYSTEMS INC., et al., Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:09-CV-446 Hon. Leonard E. Davis JURY NOTICE OF SECOND AMENDED INITIAL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT BY DEFENDANTS GOOGLE INC. AND YOUTUBE, LLC Pursuant to Local Rule CV-26(c), Defendants Google Inc. and YouTube, LLC hereby notify the Court that on August 12, 2011, all counsel of record were served with the Second Amended Initial Disclosure Statement of Google Inc. and YouTube, LLC, via electronic mail. Dated: August 15, 2010 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Michael E. Jones Michael E. Jones State Bar No. 10929400 mikejones@potterminton.com Allen F. Gardner State Bar No. 24043679 allengardner@potterminton.com POTTER MINTON, P.C. 110 N. College Ave., Suite 500 Tyler, Texas 75702 Telephone: (903) 597-8311 Facsimile: (903) 593-0846 {KEA/7713/0013/W0453618.1 } 1 Scott T. Weingaertner sweingaertner@kslaw.com Robert F. Perry rperry@kslaw.com Christopher C. Carnaval ccarnaval@kslaw.com Mark H. Francis mfrancis@kslaw.com KING & SPALDING LLP 1185 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036-4003 Telephone: (212) 556-2100 Facsimile: (212) 556-2222 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS GOOGLE INC. AND YOUTUBE, LLC CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court's CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on this 15th of August, 2011. Any other counsel of record will be served via First Class U.S. Mail on this same date. /s/ Michael E. Jones___________________ Michael E. Jones {KEA/7713/0013/W0453618.1 } 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?