Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al
Filing
848
NOTICE of Discovery Disclosure by Google Inc., YouTube, LLC Second Amended Initial Disclosure Statement (Jones, Michael)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES INC.,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
ADOBE SYSTEMS INC., et al.,
Defendants.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:09-CV-446
Hon. Leonard E. Davis
JURY
NOTICE OF SECOND AMENDED INITIAL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
BY DEFENDANTS GOOGLE INC. AND YOUTUBE, LLC
Pursuant to Local Rule CV-26(c), Defendants Google Inc. and YouTube, LLC hereby
notify the Court that on August 12, 2011, all counsel of record were served with the Second
Amended Initial Disclosure Statement of Google Inc. and YouTube, LLC, via electronic mail.
Dated: August 15, 2010
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Michael E. Jones
Michael E. Jones
State Bar No. 10929400
mikejones@potterminton.com
Allen F. Gardner
State Bar No. 24043679
allengardner@potterminton.com
POTTER MINTON, P.C.
110 N. College Ave., Suite 500
Tyler, Texas 75702
Telephone: (903) 597-8311
Facsimile: (903) 593-0846
{KEA/7713/0013/W0453618.1 }
1
Scott T. Weingaertner
sweingaertner@kslaw.com
Robert F. Perry
rperry@kslaw.com
Christopher C. Carnaval
ccarnaval@kslaw.com
Mark H. Francis
mfrancis@kslaw.com
KING & SPALDING LLP
1185 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036-4003
Telephone: (212) 556-2100
Facsimile: (212) 556-2222
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS
GOOGLE INC. AND YOUTUBE, LLC
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic
service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court's CM/ECF system per Local
Rule CV-5(a)(3) on this 15th of August, 2011. Any other counsel of record will be served via
First Class U.S. Mail on this same date.
/s/ Michael E. Jones___________________
Michael E. Jones
{KEA/7713/0013/W0453618.1 }
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?