Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 866

ORDER granting 853 Motion to Expedite Briefing on Frito-Lay's Emergency Motion for Separate Trial and To Reset Pretrial Schedule. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 8/17/11. (mjc, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION Eolas Technologies Incorporated, Plaintiff, vs. Adobe Systems Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., Apple Inc., Argosy Publishing, Inc., Blockbuster Inc., CDW Corp., Citigroup Inc., eBay Inc., Frito-Lay, Inc., The Go Daddy Group, Inc., Google Inc., J.C. Penney Company, Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co., New Frontier Media, Inc., Office Depot, Inc., Perot Systems Corp., Playboy Enterprises International, Inc., Rent-A-Center, Inc., Staples, Inc., Sun Microsystems Inc., Texas Instruments Inc., Yahoo! Inc., and YouTube, LLC Defendants. § § § Civil Action No. 6:09-CV-00446-LED § § § § JURY TRIAL § § § § § § § § § § § § § ORDER GRANTING FRITO-LAY’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXPEDITED BRIEFING ON FRITO-LAY’S EMERGENCY MOTION FOR SEPARATE TRIAL AND TO RESET PRETRIAL SCHEDULE Before the Court is Defendant Frito-Lay, Inc.’s Unopposed Motion for Expedited Briefing on Frito-Lay’s Emergency Motion for Separate Trial and To Reset Pretrial Schedule. After careful consideration, the Court is of the opinion that the Motion is meritorious and should be granted. It is therefore ORDERED that the briefing schedule for Frito-Lay’s Emergency Motion for Separate Trial and To Reset Pretrial Schedule is set out as follows: Eolas’s opposition brief due on: August 19, 2011; Frito-Lay’s reply brief due on August 26, 2011; Eolas’s sur-reply brief due on August 29, 2011; Oral Hearing set for 1:00 PM on August 31, 2011. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 17th day of August, 2011. __________________________________ LEONARD DAVIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?