Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al
Filing
910
ORDER granting 879 Stipulation of Dismissal filed by Eolas Technologies Incorporated. All claims and counterclaims in this action between pltf and deft Apple Inc are dismissed with prejudice, pursuant to a settlement agreement between the parties. Each party shall bear their own costs, expenses, and attorney's fees. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 08/22/11. cc:attys 8-22-11 (mll, )
Case 6:09-cv-00446-LED Document 879-1
Filed 08/18/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 27648
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
Eolas Technologies Incorporated,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Adobe Systems Inc., Amazon.com, Inc.,
Apple Inc., Argosy Publishing, Inc.,
Blockbuster Inc., CDW Corp.,
Citigroup Inc., eBay Inc., Frito-Lay, Inc.,
The Go Daddy Group, Inc., Google Inc.,
J.C. Penney Company, Inc., JPMorgan
Chase & Co., New Frontier Media, Inc.,
Office Depot, Inc., Perot Systems Corp.,
Playboy Enterprises International, Inc.,
Rent-A-Center, Inc., Staples, Inc., Sun
Microsystems Inc., Texas Instruments Inc.,
Yahoo! Inc., and YouTube, LLC
Defendants.
§
§
§ Civil Action No. 6:09-CV-00446-LED
§
§
§
§
JURY TRIAL
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
ORDER AND JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL
The foregoing stipulation is hereby approved and IT IS ORDERED that all claims by
Plaintiffs Eolas Technologies Incorporated against Defendants Apple Inc. (together, the
“Parties”), and all claims by Apple Inc. against Eolas Technologies Incorporated, are hereby
dismissed with prejudice pursuant to a settlement agreement between the Parties. Each of the
foregoing parties shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees with respect to these claims.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
BY THE COURT:
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 22nd day of August, 2011.
__________________________________
LEONARD DAVIS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?