Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 939

ORDER granting 933 Sealed Patent Motion for Leave to Supplement. Eolas shall serve supplemental infringement contentions against Staples for thestapleslink.com and eway.com websites within three days of this Order. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 08/25/11. cc:attys 8-25-11 (mll, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION Eolas Technologies Incorporated, Plaintiff, vs. Adobe Systems Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., Apple Inc., Argosy Publishing, Inc., Blockbuster Inc., CDW Corp., Citigroup Inc., eBay Inc., Frito-Lay, Inc., The Go Daddy Group, Inc., Google Inc., J.C. Penney Company, Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co., New Frontier Media, Inc., Office Depot, Inc., Perot Systems Corp., Playboy Enterprises International, Inc., Rent-A-Center, Inc., Staples, Inc., Sun Microsystems Inc., Texas Instruments Inc., Yahoo! Inc., and YouTube, LLC Defendants. § § § Civil Action No. 6:09-CV-00446-LED § § § § JURY TRIAL § § § § § § § § § § § § § ORDER GRANTING EOLAS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT ITS P.R. 3-1 INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS WITH RESPECT TO STAPLESLINK.COM AND EWAY.COM The Court, having considered Eolas Technologies Inc.’s Unopposed Motion to Leave to Supplement Its Infringement Contentions to Include Staples’ Stapleslink.com and Eway.com (“Unopposed Motion,”) finds good cause having been shown, the motion is meritorious and should be GRANTED. Eolas shall serve supplemental infringement contentions against Staples for the stapleslink.com and eway.com websites within three days of this Order. No other deadline applicable to this litigation is affected by this Order. 1 So ORDERED and SIGNED this 25th day of August, 2011. __________________________________ LEONARD DAVIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?